Menu Close

Onshore Relocation of the 1918 Bundaberg Earthquake

 Paul Somerville
 

Southeastern Queensland was struck by a strong earthquake at 04:14 a.m. local time on 7 June 1918. As shown on the right side of Figure 1, previous studies have suggested that the epicentre of this earthquake lies off the coast of Bundaberg. The epicentral location shown by the orange star marked RIV was based upon instrumental observations from the Riverview College observatory in Sydney. However, this epicentre lies about 250 km to the northeast of an inland region that experienced both the strongest shaking effects and numerous felt aftershocks, as shown on the left side of Figure 1. Martin et al. (2024) reviewed available macroseismic data from 224 geographic locations and seismograms of the earthquake. They found that the most likely epicentral location was inland at about 24.93° S and 150.88° E in the Banana Shire and North Burnett region, as shown by the red stars in Figure 1. The revised magnitude of Mw 6.0 ± 0.3 indicates that it was one of the largest onshore earthquakes in eastern Australia in the past century.

Figure 1. Panel (a): The isoseismal map from Hedley (1925) showing the single Rossi–Forel (RF) contour in red. Panel (b): isoseismal contours in Everingham et al. (1982). The stars indicate all epicentral estimates: Riverview (RIV; orange star), International Seismological Summary (ISS; yellow star), Everingham et al. (1982, GA; blue star), and revised location in Martin et al. (red star). Source: Martin et al. (2024).

Locations of the strongest mainshock intensities and aftershocks

Martin et al. (2024) carefully reviewed intensity observations and concluded that the strongest mainshock intensities occurred in Banana Shire and North Burnett Shire, whose locations are shown on the right side of Figure 1. This region coincides with the red ellipse in Figure 2, which encompasses the region where aftershocks were reported in the days and weeks following the mainshock, as identified by Martin et al. (2024). The revised mainshock epicentral estimate (red star) and the locations of the 1935 Gayndah and the 2015 Eidsvold earthquakes (yellow stars) are also shown. The grey dotted contours for the posterior mainshock location distribution were determined using the Griffin et al. (2019) Bayesian inversion method.

Figure 2. Locations of felt aftershocks of the Bundaberg earthquake. The red ellipse encloses the region where aftershocks were reported in the days and weeks following the mainshock on. The revised epicentral estimate (red star) and the locations of the 1935 Gayndah and the 2015 Eidsvold earthquakes (yellow stars) are shown. The grey dotted contours represent the posterior mainshock location distribution. Source: Martin et al. (2024).

Revised Identification of the P wave Arrival at Riverview.

The seismograms recorded on the Weichert and Mainka seismometers at Riverview are shown in Figure 3. The original compressional wave (P-wave) pick listed in the RIV station bulletin is marked on the original Weichert seismogram (Fig. 3a, inset). The blue arrow in Figure 3a shows that the observatory personnel interpreted the P-wave arrival to be a pulse with a period of about 6 seconds marked with the blue P symbol. However, Martin et al. (2024) interpreted this arrival to be ocean wave generated microseisms, which typically have a period of 6 seconds. Martin et al. (2024) suggest that the actual P arrival (red arrow) is instead the sharper pulse appearing about 31 s after the original P pick, marked with a red arrow and P symbol (Fig. 3). The time between the P and S (shear wave) arrivals indicates the distance between the seismograph station and the earthquake epicentre. The revised S–P time of 95.1 s reduces the estimated distance between the epicentre and RIV from 10.5° (about 1166 km) to 8.4° (about 932 km).

Figure 3. North-component seismograms from the (a) Wiechert and (b) Mainka seismometers at Riverview for the 7 June 1918 earthquake. The time of the original P-arrival pick as entered into the Riverview station bulletin is indicated by a blue arrow in the inset of panel (a) and the S-P intervals obtained using the revised P and S arrival marked in red are indicated for both seismograms. Source: Martin et al. (2024).

The relocation of the epicentre of the Bundaberg earthquake shown in Figures 1 and 2 is based on the distance from Riverside from this revised S-P time at Riverview, and estimated distances from Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Jakarta. The grey dotted contours for the posterior mainshock location distribution in Figure 2 were determined using the Griffin et al. (2019) Bayesian inversion method.

Implications for Seismic Hazard in Southeastern Queensland

The 2023 revision of the National Seismic Hazard Assessment (NSHA23; Allen et al., 2023) was based on the RIV location of the Bundaberg earthquake shown in Figure 1. The Bundaberg earthquake moment magnitude Mw in NSHA23 is 5.87, slightly less than the value of 6.0 obtained by Martin et al. (2024), and similar to the Mw of 5.9 for the 22 February 2022 Woods Point earthquake in Victoria. If NSHA23 were to be revised using the relocated epicentre and magnitude of the Bundaberg earthquake, the seismic hazard level would increase slightly in the coastal towns of Southeastern Queensland and increase more in the inland regions within about 200 km of the coast.

References

Allen, T. I., J. D. Griffin, D. J. Clark, P. R. Cummins, H. Ghasemi, and R. Ebrahimi (2023). The 2023 National Seismic Hazard Assessment for Australia: Model overview, Geoscience Australia Record 2023/53, doi: 10.26186/148969.

Everingham, I. B., D. Denham, and S. A. Greenhalgh (1987). Surface wave magnitudes of some early Australian earthquakes, BMG J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 10, 253–259.

Griffin, J., N. Nguyen, P. Cummins, and A. Cipta (2019). Historical earthquakes of the Eastern Sunda Arc: Source mechanisms and intensity-based testing of Indonesia’s national seismic hazard assessment, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 109, no. 1, 43–65, doi: 10.1785/0120180085.

Hedley, C. (1925). The Queensland earthquake of 1918, Trans. R. Geograph. Soc. Aust. 1, 151–156.

Martin, Stacey S, Phil R. Cummins, Jonathan D. Griffin, Dan Clark, Trevor I. Allen (2024). Resolving the Location and Magnitude of the 1918 Queensland (Bundaberg), Australia, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2024; doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240029

About the author/s
Paul Somerville
Chief Geoscientist at Risk Frontiers | Other Posts

Paul is Chief Geoscientist at Risk Frontiers. He has a PhD in Geophysics, and has 45 years experience as an engineering seismologist, including 15 years with Risk Frontiers. He has had first hand experience of damaging earthquakes in California, Japan, Taiwan and New Zealand. He works on the development of QuakeAUS and QuakeNZ.

Want to know more about our Earthquake Risk Analysis and Loss models?

With decades of experience, unparalleled research, and a proven track record, Risk Frontiers stands as a beacon of excellence in understanding and quantifying seismic risks. Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the depth of our studies, the precision of our models, and the trust our clients place in us.

Introducing QuakeAUS and QuakeNZ – Risk Frontiers’ premier earthquake loss models. While QuakeAUS delves deep into Australia’s seismic activities, QuakeNZ captures the unique seismic patterns of New Zealand. Both models offer comprehensive coverage, from individual address nuances to broader zones like SA1, postcode, and Cresta. Built on cutting-edge technology and backed by rigorous research, QuakeAUS and QuakeNZ stand as the epitome of reliability and precision in earthquake risk assessment.

Have queries on seismic risks? Our seasoned team is ready to assist.